10 Comments

1. Greg Swann July 16, 2007 at 12:57

   Much beter! I’d loved to see the whole thing kerned, but they need to hit that cumberland gap between the V and the A, at a minimum.
2. larry cragun July 16, 2007 at 13:08

   Well done.
3. Michael Wurzer July 16, 2007 at 13:27

   I like these much more than the others.
4. Galen July 16, 2007 at 14:30

   Nice!
5. Jim Duncan July 16, 2007 at 17:00

   Thanks everybody – hearing so quickly from people whom I respect made the decision easy.

   Thank you.
6. Athol Kay July 16, 2007 at 18:16

   Agree, much better. I like the top one better than the bottom one. Image seem better defined for being darker.
7. Jay Thompson July 16, 2007 at 20:52

   I like ’em (prefer the top as well). I assume Greg’s referring to the spacing between the letters (a graphics person I am not). Seems to me the V and A do need to be smushed together a tad.
8. Jennifer July 17, 2007 at 12:35

   Good work on the logo- it looks great!
9. Bret Harris July 21, 2007 at 06:46

   This has been a useful lesson in how a logo needs to be more than just some random parts put together, so in this case the initial logos did serve a purpose.
10. Jim Duncan July 23, 2007 at 07:56

    Thanks for stopping by, Brett. I agree that without the first logo, the second one wouldn’t have been as good as I think it is. I also would have doubted the second one more had I not been so disappointed with the first.